sealcontent:

officialleoneabbacchio:

officialleoneabbacchio:

I JSUT REMEMBERED THE “WHERES THE BABIES” VIDEO AND I NEED TO WATCH IT AGAIN

RIGHT

FUCKING

NOW

i wish i could say “where’s the babies” to summon several tiny mewing blobs to climb on me

(Source: acreaturecalledgreed)

halfprincesshalfgoddess:

You: Weird flex but ok

Me, an intellectual:

queeranarchism:

“Gentrifiers focus on aesthetics, not people. Because people, to them, are aesthetics. Proponents of gentrification will vouch for its benevolence by noting it “cleaned up the neighbourhood”. This is often code for a literal white-washing. The problems that existed in the neighbourhood - poverty, lack of opportunity, struggling populations denied city services - did not go away. They were simply priced out to a new location. That new location is often an impoverished suburb, which lacks the glamour to make it the object of future renewal efforts. There is no history to attract preservationists because there is nothing in poor suburbs viewed as worth preserving, including the futures of the people forced to live in them. This is blight without beauty, ruin without romance: payday loan stores, dollar stores, unassuming homes and unpaid bills. In the suburbs, poverty looks banal and is overlooked. In cities, gentrifiers have the political clout - and accompanying racial privilege - to reallocate resources and repair infrastructure. The neighbourhood is “cleaned up” through the removal of its residents. Gentrifiers can then bask in “urban life” - the storied history, the selective nostalgia, the carefully sprinkled grit - while avoiding responsibility to those they displaced.”

— Sarah Kendzior - The peril of hipster economics (x)

(Source: mizoguchi)

gentlesleaze:

photoshop when I go to save a gif: 3.023 Mb
me, trying to reduce the size: deletes 40 frames, decreases brightness, ups the contrast, crops canvas, makes small offering to a local deity
photoshop: 3.022 :)

gaypeopletwitter: